#Smart Card Technology in Access Control | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

justforbooks · 5 months ago

Text

Source Code: My Beginnings by Bill Gates

In contrast to the current crop of swaggering tech bros, the Microsoft founder comes across as wry and self-deprecating in this memoir of starting out

Bill Gates is the John McEnroe of the tech world: once a snotty brat whom everyone loved to hate, now grown up into a beloved elder statesman. Former rivals, most notably Apple’s Steve Jobs, have since departed this dimension, while the Gates Foundation, focusing on unsexy but important technologies such as malaria nets, was doing “effective altruism” long before that became a fashionable term among philosophically minded tech bros. Time, then, to look back. In the first of what the author threatens will be a trilogy of memoirs, Gates recounts the first two decades of his life, from his birth in 1955 to the founding of Microsoft and its agreement to supply a version of the Basic programming language to Apple Computer in 1977.

He grows up in a pleasant suburb of Seattle with a lawyer father and a schoolteacher mother. His intellectual development is keyed to an origin scene in which he is fascinated by his grandmother’s skill at card games around the family dining table. The eight-year-old Gates realises that gin rummy and sevens are systems of dynamic data that the player can learn to manipulate.

As he tells it, Gates was a rather disruptive schoolchild, always playing the smart alec and not wanting to try too hard, until he first learned to use a computer terminal under the guidance of an influential maths teacher named Bill Dougall. (I wanted to learn more about this man than Gates supplies in a still extraordinary thumbnail sketch: “He had been a World War II Navy pilot and worked as an aeronautical engineer at Boeing. Somewhere along the way he earned a degree in French Literature from the Sorbonne in Paris on top of graduate degrees in engineering and education.”) Ah, the computer terminal. It is 1968, so the school terminal communicates with a mainframe elsewhere. Soon enough, the 13-year-old Gates has taught it to play noughts and crosses. He is hooked. He befriends another pupil, Paul Allen – who will later introduce him to alcohol and LSD – and together they pore over programming manuals deep into the night. Gates plans a vast simulation war game, but he and his friends get their first taste of writing actually useful software when they are asked to automate class scheduling after their school merges with another. Success with this leads the children, now calling themselves the Lakeside Programming Group, to write a payroll program for local businesses, and later to create software for traffic engineers.

There follows a smooth transition to Harvard, where in the ferment of anti-war campus protests our hero is more interested in the arrival, one day in 1969, of a PDP-10 computer. Gates takes classes in maths but also chemistry and the Greek classics. Realising he doesn’t have it in him to become a pure mathematician, he goes all-in on computers once a new home machine, the Altair, is announced. He and Paul Allen will write its Basic, having decided to call themselves “Micro-Soft”.

The early home computer scene, Gates notes, was a countercultural, hippy thing: cheap computers “represented a triumph of the masses against the monolithic corporations and establishment forces that controlled access to computing”, and so software was widely “shared”, or copied among people for free. It was Gates himself who, notoriously, pushed back against this culture when he found out most users of his Basic weren’t paying for it. By “stealing software”, he wrote in an open letter in 1976, “you prevent good software from being written. Who can afford to do professional work for nothing?” This rubbed a lot of people up the wrong way and still does, at least in the more militant parts of the “open-source” world. But he had a point. And that, readers, is why your Office 365 account just renewed for another year. Fans of Word and Excel, though, will have to wait for subsequent volumes of Gates’s recollections, as will those who want more about his later battles with Apple, though Steve Jobs does get an amusing walk-on part. (Micro-Soft’s general manager keeps a notebook of sales calls, on one page of which we read: “11.15 Steve Jobs calls. Was very rude.”). This volume, still, is more than just a geek’s inventory of early achievements. There is a genuine gratitude for influential mentors, and a wry mood of self-deprecation throughout. Gates gleefully records his first preschool report: “He seemed determined to impress us with his complete lack of concern for any phase of school life.” Later, he explains how he acquired a sudden interest in theatre classes. “Admittedly the main draw for me was the higher percentage of girls in drama. And since the main activity in the class was to read lines to each other, the odds were very good that I’d actually talk to one.” Strikingly, unlike most “self-made” billionaires, Gates emphasises the “unearned privilege” of his upbringing and the peculiar circumstances – “mostly out of my control” – that enabled his career. Adorably, he even admits to still having panic dreams about his university exams. The book’s most touching pages recount how one of his closest friends and colleagues in the programming group, Kent Evans, died in a mountaineering accident when he was 17. “Throughout my life, I have tended to deal with loss by avoiding it,” Gates writes. He says later that if he were growing up today, he would probably be identified as “on the autism spectrum”, and now regrets some of his early behaviour, though “I wouldn’t change the brain I was given for anything”. There is a sense of the writer, older and wiser, trying to redeem the past through understanding it better, a thing that no one has yet seen Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg attempt in public. That alone makes Bill Gates a more human tech titan than most of his rivals, past and present.

Daily inspiration. Discover more photos at Just for Books…?

#just for books #Bill Gates #Source Code #book review

7 notes · View notes

mariacallous · 4 months ago

Text

Scan the online brochures of companies who sell workplace monitoring tech and you’d think the average American worker was a renegade poised to take their employer down at the next opportunity. “Nearly half of US employees admit to time theft!” “Biometric readers for enhanced accuracy!” “Offer staff benefits in a controlled way with Vending Machine Access!”

A new wave of return-to-office mandates has arrived since the New Year, including at JP Morgan Chase, leading advertising agency WPP, and Amazon—not to mention President Trump’s late January directive to the heads of federal agencies to “terminate remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work in-person … on a full-time basis.” Five years on from the pandemic, when the world showed how effectively many roles could be performed remotely or flexibly, what’s caused the sudden change of heart?

“There’s two things happening,” says global industry analyst Josh Bersin, who is based in California. “The economy is actually slowing down, so companies are hiring less. So there is a trend toward productivity in general, and then AI has forced virtually every company to reallocate resources toward AI projects.

“The expectation amongst CEOs is that’s going to eliminate a lot of jobs. A lot of these back-to-work mandates are due to frustration that both of those initiatives are hard to measure or hard to do when we don’t know what people are doing at home.”

The question is, what exactly are we returning to?

Take any consumer tech buzzword of the 21st century and chances are it’s already being widely used across the US to monitor time, attendance and, in some cases, the productivity of workers, in sectors such as manufacturing, retail, and fast food chains: RFID badges, GPS time clock apps, NFC apps, QR code clocking-in, Apple Watch badges, and palm, face, eye, voice, and finger scanners. Biometric scanners have long been sold to companies as a way to avoid hourly workers “buddy punching” for each other at the start and end of shifts—so-called “time theft.” A return-to-office mandate and its enforcement opens the door for similar scenarios for salaried staff.

Track and Trace

The latest, deluxe end point of these time and attendance tchotchkes and apps is something like Austin-headquartered HID’s OmniKey platform. Designed for factories, hospitals, universities and offices, this is essentially an all-encompassing RFID log-in and security system for employees, via smart cards, smartphone wallets, and wearables. These will not only monitor turnstile entrances, exits, and floor access by way of elevators but also parking, the use of meeting rooms, the cafeteria, printers, lockers, and yes, vending machine access.

These technologies, and more sophisticated worker location- and behavior-tracking systems, are expanding from blue-collar jobs to pink-collar industries and even white-collar office settings. Depending on the survey, approximately 70 to 80 percent of large US employers now use some form of employee monitoring, and the likes of PwC have explicitly told workers that managers will be tracking their location to enforce a three-day office week policy.

“Several of these earlier technologies, like RFID sensors and low-tech barcode scanners, have been used in manufacturing, in warehouses, or in other settings for some time,” says Wolfie Christl, a researcher of workplace surveillance for Cracked Labs, a nonprofit based in Vienna, Austria. “We’re moving toward the use of all kinds of sensor data, and this kind of technology is certainly now moving into the offices. However, I think for many of these, it’s questionable whether they really make sense there.”

What’s new, at least to the recent pandemic age of hybrid working, is the extent to which workers can now be tracked inside office buildings. Cracked Labs published a frankly terrifying 25-page case study report in November 2024 showing how systems of wireless networking, motion sensors, and Bluetooth beacons, whether intentionally or as a byproduct of their capabilities, can provide “behavioral monitoring and profiling” in office settings.

The project breaks the tech down into two categories: The first is technology that tracks desk presence and room occupancy, and the second monitors the indoor location, movement, and behavior of the people working inside the building.

To start with desk and room occupancy, Spacewell offers a mix of motion sensors installed under desks, in ceilings, and at doorways in “office spaces” and heat sensors and low-resolution visual sensors to show which desks and rooms are being used. Both real-time and trend data are available to managers via its “live data floorplan,” and the sensors also capture temperature, environmental, light intensity, and humidity data.

The Swiss-headquartered Locatee, meanwhile, uses existing badge and device data via Wi-Fi and LAN to continuously monitor clocking in and clocking out, time spent by workers at desks and on specific floors, and the number of hours and days spent by employees at the office per week. While the software displays aggregate rather than individual personal employee data to company executives, the Cracked Labs report points out that Locatee offers a segmented team analytics report which “reveals data on small groups.”

As more companies return to the office, the interest in this idea of “optimized” working spaces is growing fast. According to S&S Insider’s early 2025 analysis, the connected office was worth $43 billion in 2023 and will grow to $122.5 billion by 2032. Alongside this, IndustryARC predicts there will be a $4.5 billion employee-monitoring-technology market, mostly in North America, by 2026—the only issue being that the crossover between the two is blurry at best.

At the end of January, Logitech showed off its millimeter-wave radar Spot sensors, which are designed to allow employers to monitor whether rooms are being used and which rooms in the building are used the most. A Logitech rep told The Verge that the peel-and-stick devices, which also monitor VOCs, temperature, and humidity, could theoretically estimate the general placement of people in a meeting room.

As Christl explains, because of the functionality that these types of sensor-based systems offer, there is the very real possibility of a creep from legitimate applications, such as managing energy use, worker health and safety, and ensuring sufficient office resources into more intrusive purposes.

“For me, the main issue is that if companies use highly sensitive data like tracking the location of employees’ devices and smartphones indoors or even use motion detectors indoors,” he says, “then there must be totally reliable safeguards that this data is not being used for any other purposes.”

Big Brother Is Watching

This warning becomes even more pressing where workers’ indoor location, movement, and behavior are concerned. Cisco’s Spaces cloud platform has digitized 11 billion square feet of enterprise locations, producing 24.7 trillion location data points. The Spaces system is used by more than 8,800 businesses worldwide and is deployed by the likes of InterContinental Hotels Group, WeWork, the NHS Foundation, and San Jose State University, according to Cisco’s website.

While it has applications for retailers, restaurants, hotels, and event venues, many of its features are designed to function in office environments, including meeting room management and occupancy monitoring. Spaces is designed as a comprehensive, all-seeing eye into how employees (and customers and visitors, depending on the setting) and their connected devices, equipment, or “assets” move through physical spaces.

Cisco has achieved this by using its existing wireless infrastructure and combining data from Wi-Fi access points with Bluetooth tracking. Spaces offers employers both real-time views and historical data dashboards. The use cases? Everything from meeting-room scheduling and optimizing cleaning schedules to more invasive dashboards on employees’ entry and exit times, the duration of staff workdays, visit durations by floor, and other “behavior metrics.” This includes those related to performance, a feature pitched at manufacturing sites.

Some of these analytics use aggregate data, but Cracked Labs details how Spaces goes beyond this into personal data, with device usernames and identifiers that make it possible to single out individuals. While the ability to protect privacy by using MAC randomization is there, Cisco emphasizes that this makes indoor movement analytics “unreliable” and other applications impossible—leaving companies to make that decision themselves.

Management even has the ability to send employees nudge-style alerts based on their location in the building. An IBM application, based on Cisco’s underlying technology, offers to spot anomalies in occupancy patterns and send notifications to workers or their managers based on what it finds. Cisco’s Spaces can also incorporate video footage from Cisco security cameras and WebEx video conferencing hardware into the overall system of indoor movement monitoring; another example of function creep from security to employee tracking in the workplace.

“Cisco is simply everywhere. As soon as employers start to repurpose data that is being collected from networking or IT infrastructure, this quickly becomes very dangerous, from my perspective.” says Christl. “With this kind of indoor location tracking technology based on its Wi-Fi networks, I think that a vendor as major as Cisco has a responsibility to ensure it doesn’t suggest or market solutions that are really irresponsible to employers.

“I would consider any productivity and performance tracking very problematic when based on this kind of intrusive behavioral data.” WIRED approached Cisco for comment but didn’t receive a response before publication.

Cisco isn't alone in this, though. Similar to Spaces, Juniper’s Mist offers an indoor tracking system that uses both Wi-Fi networks and Bluetooth beacons to locate people, connected devices, and Bluetooth tagged badges on a real-time map, with the option of up to 13 months of historical data on worker behavior.

Juniper’s offering, for workplaces including offices, hospitals, manufacturing sites, and retailers, is so precise that it is able to provide records of employees’ device names, together with the exact enter and exit times and duration of visits between “zones” in offices—including one labeled “break area/kitchen” in a demo. Yikes.

For each of these systems, a range of different applications is functionally possible, and some which raise labor-law concerns. “A worst-case scenario would be that management wants to fire someone and then starts looking into historical records trying to find some misconduct,” says Christl. "If it’s necessary to investigate employees, then there should be a procedure where, for example, a worker representative is looking into the fine-grained behavioral data together with management. This would be another safeguard to prevent misuse.”

Above and Beyond?

If warehouse-style tracking has the potential for management overkill in office settings, it makes even less sense in service and health care jobs, and American unions are now pushing for more access to data and quotas used in disciplinary action. Elizabeth Anderson, professor of public philosophy at the University of Michigan and the author of Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives, describes how black-box algorithm-driven management and monitoring affects not just the day-to-day of nursing staff but also their sense of work and value.

“Surveillance and this idea of time theft, it’s all connected to this idea of wasting time,” she explains. “Essentially all relational work is considered inefficient. In a memory care unit, for example, the system will say how long to give a patient breakfast, how many minutes to get them dressed, and so forth.

“Maybe an Alzheimer’s patient is frightened, so a nurse has to spend some time calming them down, or perhaps they have lost some ability overnight. That’s not one of the discrete physical tasks that can be measured. Most of the job is helping that person cope with declining faculties; it takes time for that, for people to read your emotions and respond appropriately. What you get is massive moral injury with this notion of efficiency.”

This kind of monitoring extends to service workers, including servers in restaurants and cleaning staff, according to a 2023 Cracked Labs’ report into retail and hospitality. Software developed by Oracle is used to, among other applications, rate and rank servers based on speed, sales, timekeeping around breaks, and how many tips they receive. Similar Oracle software that monitors mobile workers such as housekeepers and cleaners in hotels uses a timer for app-based micromanagement—for instance, “you have two minutes for this room, and there are four tasks.”

As Christl explains, this simply doesn’t work in practice. “People have to struggle to combine what they really do with this kind of rigid, digital system. And it’s not easy to standardize work like talking to patients and other kinds of affective work, like how friendly you are as a waiter. This is a major problem. These systems cannot represent the work that is being done accurately.”

But can knowledge work done in offices ever be effectively measured and assessed either? In an episode of his podcast in January, host Ezra Klein battled his own feelings about having many of his best creative ideas at a café down the street from where he lives rather than in The New York Times’ Manhattan offices. Anderson agrees that creativity often has to find its own path.

“Say there’s a webcam tracking your eyes to make sure you’re looking at the screen,” she says. “We know that daydreaming a little can actually help people come up with creative ideas. Just letting your mind wander is incredibly useful for productivity overall, but that requires some time looking around or out the window. The software connected to your camera is saying you’re off-duty—that you’re wasting time. Nobody’s mind can keep concentrated for the whole work day, but you don’t even want that from a productivity point of view.”

Even for roles where it might make more methodological sense to track discrete physical tasks, there can be negative consequences of nonstop monitoring. Anderson points to a scene in Erik Gandini’s 2023 documentary After Work that shows an Amazon delivery driver who is monitored, via camera, for their driving, delivery quotas, and even getting dinged for using Spotify in the van.

“It’s very tightly regulated and super, super intrusive, and it’s all based on distrust as the starting point,” she says. “What these tech bros don’t understand is that if you install surveillance technology, which is all about distrusting the workers, there is a deep feature of human psychology that is reciprocity. If you don’t trust me, I’m not going to trust you. You think an employee who doesn’t trust the boss is going to be working with the same enthusiasm? I don’t think so.”

Trust Issues

The fixes, then, might be in the leadership itself, not more data dashboards. “Our research shows that excessive monitoring in the workplace can damage trust, have a negative impact on morale, and cause stress and anxiety,” says Hayfa Mohdzaini, senior policy and practice adviser for technology at the CIPD, the UK’s professional body for HR, learning, and development. “Employers might achieve better productivity by investing in line manager training and ensuring employees feel supported with reasonable expectations around office attendance and manageable workloads.”

A 2023 Pew Research study found that 56 percent of US workers were opposed to the use of AI to keep track of when employees were at their desks, and 61 percent were against tracking employees’ movements while they work.

This dropped to just 51 percent of workers who were opposed to recording work done on company computers, through the use of a kind of corporate “spyware” often accepted by staff in the private sector. As Josh Bersin puts it, “Yes, the company can read your emails” with platforms such as Teramind, even including “sentiment analysis” of employee messages.

Snooping on files, emails, and digital chats takes on new significance when it comes to government workers, though. New reporting from WIRED, based on conversations with employees at 13 federal agencies, reveals the extent to Elon Musk’s DOGE team’s surveillance: software including Google’s Gemini AI chatbot, a Dynatrace extension, and security tool Splunk have been added to government computers in recent weeks, and some people have felt they can’t speak freely on recorded and transcribed Microsoft Teams calls. Various agencies already use Everfox software and Dtex’s Intercept system, which generates individual risk scores for workers based on websites and files accessed.

Alongside mass layoffs and furloughs over the past four weeks, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency has also, according to CBS News and NPR reports, gone into multiple agencies in February with the theater and bombast of full X-ray security screenings replacing entry badges at Washington, DC, headquarters. That’s alongside managers telling staff that their logging in and out of devices, swiping in and out of workspaces, and all of their digital work chats will be “closely monitored” going forward.

“Maybe they’re trying to make a big deal out of it to scare people right now,” says Bersin. “The federal government is using back-to-work as an excuse to lay off a bunch of people.”

DOGE staff have reportedly even added keylogger software to government computers to track everything employees type, with staff concerned that anyone using keywords related to progressive thinking or "disloyalty” to Trump could be targeted—not to mention the security risks it introduces for those working on sensitive projects. As one worker told NPR, it feels “Soviet-style” and “Orwellian” with “nonstop monitoring.” Anderson describes the overall DOGE playbook as a series of “deeply intrusive invasions of privacy.”

Alternate Realities

But what protections are out there for employees? Certain states, such as New York and Illinois, do offer strong privacy protections against, for example, unnecessary biometric tracking in the private sector, and California’s Consumer Privacy Act covers workers as well as consumers. Overall, though, the lack of federal-level labor law in this area makes the US something of an alternate reality to what is legal in the UK and Europe.

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act in the US allows employee monitoring for legitimate business reasons and with the worker’s consent. In Europe, Algorithm Watch has made country analyses for workplace surveillance in the UK, Italy, Sweden, and Poland. To take one high-profile example of the stark difference: In early 2024, Serco was ordered by the UK's privacy watchdog, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), to stop using face recognition and fingerprint scanning systems, designed by Shopworks, to track the time and attendance of 2,000 staff across 38 leisure centers around the country. This new guidance led to more companies reviewing or cutting the technology altogether, including Virgin Active, which pulled similar biometric employee monitoring systems from 30-plus sites.

Despite a lack of comprehensive privacy rights in the US, though, worker protest, union organizing, and media coverage can provide a firewall against some office surveillance schemes. Unions such as the Service Employees International Union are pushing for laws to protect workers from black-box algorithms dictating the pace of output.

In December, Boeing scrapped a pilot of employee monitoring at offices in Missouri and Washington, which was based on a system of infrared motion sensors and VuSensor cameras installed in ceilings, made by Ohio-based Avuity. The U-turn came after a Boeing employee leaked an internal PowerPoint presentation on the occupancy- and headcount-tracking technology to The Seattle Times. In a matter of weeks, Boeing confirmed that managers would remove all the sensors that had been installed to date.

Under-desk sensors, in particular, have received high-profile backlash, perhaps because they are such an obvious piece of surveillance hardware rather than simply software designed to record work done on company machines. In the fall of 2022, students at Northeastern University hacked and removed under-desk sensors produced by EnOcean, offering “presence detection” and “people counting,” that had been installed in the school’s Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering Complex. The university provost eventually informed students that the department had planned to use the sensors with the Spaceti platform to optimize desk usage.

OccupEye (now owned by FM: Systems), another type of under-desk heat and motion sensor, received a similar reaction from staff at Barclays Bank and The Telegraph newspaper in London, with employees protesting and, in some cases, physically removing the devices that tracked the time they spent away from their desks.

Despite the fallout, Barclays later faced a $1.1 billion fine from the ICO when it was found to have deployed Sapience’s employee monitoring software in its offices, with the ability to single out and track individual employees. Perhaps unsurprisingly in the current climate, that same software company now offers “lightweight device-level technology” to monitor return-to-office policy compliance, with a dashboard breaking employee location down by office versus remote for specific departments and teams.

According to Elizabeth Anderson’s latest book Hijacked, while workplace surveillance culture and the obsession with measuring employee efficiency might feel relatively new, it can actually be traced back to the invention of the “work ethic” by the Puritans in the 16th and 17th centuries.

“They thought you should be working super hard; you shouldn’t be idling around when you should be in work,” she says. “You can see some elements there that can be developed into a pretty hostile stance toward workers. The Puritans were obsessed with not wasting time. It was about gaining assurance of salvation through your behavior. With the Industrial Revolution, the ‘no wasting time’ became a profit-maximizing strategy. Now you’re at work 24/7 because they can get you on email.”

Some key components of the original work ethic, though, have been skewed or lost over time. The Puritans also had strict constraints on what duties employers had toward their workers: paying a living wage and providing safe and healthy working conditions.

“You couldn’t just rule them tyrannically, or so they said. You had to treat them as your fellow Christians, with dignity and respect. In many ways the original work ethic was an ethic which uplifted workers.”

6 notes · View notes

rahilatach · 1 year ago

Text

Raspberry Pi Board: Revolutionizing Computing and Education

The Raspberry Pi board is a series of small, affordable single-board computers developed by the Raspberry Pi Foundation, a UK-based charity focused on promoting computer science education and digital literacy. Since its launch in 2012, the Raspberry Pi has transformed from a niche educational tool into a versatile platform used in a wide range of applications, from DIY electronics projects to industrial automation.

A Brief History

The first Raspberry Pi, the Model B, was released in February 2012. Designed to promote basic computer science in schools and developing countries, it featured a 700 MHz ARM11 processor, 256 MB of RAM, and basic connectivity options. The success of the Model B led to a rapid expansion of the Raspberry Pi lineup, with various models offering improved performance, more memory, and enhanced connectivity.

Key Features and Models

Raspberry Pi 1 Model B (2012):

Processor: 700 MHz ARM11

Memory: 256 MB RAM

Ports: 2 USB 2.0 ports, HDMI, Composite video, 3.5mm audio jack, Ethernet

Storage: SD card slot

Raspberry Pi 2 Model B (2015):

Processor: 900 MHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A7

Memory: 1 GB RAM

Ports: 4 USB 2.0 ports, HDMI, Composite video, 3.5mm audio jack, Ethernet

Storage: MicroSD card slot

Raspberry Pi 3 Model B (2016):

Processor: 1.2 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53

Memory: 1 GB RAM

Ports: 4 USB 2.0 ports, HDMI, Composite video, 3.5mm audio jack, Ethernet

Wireless: Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

Raspberry Pi 4 Model B (2019):

Processor: 1.5 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A72

Memory: Options of 2 GB, 4 GB, and 8 GB RAM

Ports: 2 USB 3.0 ports, 2 USB 2.0 ports, 2 Micro HDMI ports, Ethernet, USB-C for power

Wireless: Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

Raspberry Pi Zero (2015) and Zero W (2017):

Processor: 1 GHz single-core ARM11

Memory: 512 MB RAM

Ports: Mini HDMI, Micro USB OTG, Micro USB for power, GPIO pins

Wireless (Zero W): Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

Applications and Uses

The versatility of the Raspberry Pi has led to its adoption in numerous fields:

Education:

Coding and Programming: Used in schools and educational programs to teach students programming languages such as Python, Scratch, and Java.

Computer Science Concepts: Introduces concepts like hardware, software, and networking.

DIY Projects and Maker Community:

Home Automation: Controls smart home devices, including lights, thermostats, and security systems.

Media Centers: Powers home media centers using software like Kodi.

Retro Gaming: Emulates classic gaming consoles using software like RetroPie.

Industrial and Commercial Applications:

IoT Devices: Serves as a hub for Internet of Things (IoT) devices, enabling data collection and remote control.

Automation and Control Systems: Used in factories and labs for monitoring and controlling equipment.

Research and Development:

Prototyping: Facilitates rapid prototyping of electronic devices and systems.

Data Collection: Gathers data from various sensors in environmental and scientific research.

Community and Ecosystem

The Raspberry Pi has cultivated a vibrant global community of developers, hobbyists, educators, and students. Online forums, tutorials, and community projects provide extensive support and resources for users at all skill levels. The Raspberry Pi Foundation also offers official accessories, including cases, cameras, and expansion boards, further enhancing the functionality of the Raspberry Pi.

Conclusion

The Raspberry Pi board has revolutionized the way people learn about and interact with technology. Its affordability, versatility, and extensive support network have made it an indispensable tool in education, DIY projects, and professional applications. As technology continues to evolve, the Raspberry Pi Foundation remains committed to expanding the capabilities and accessibility of this remarkable platform, ensuring that computing remains within reach for everyone.

#technology

3 notes · View notes

rasalhague888 · 1 year ago

Text

ChatGPT: Chemtrail Conspiracy and RFID

User: RFID technology, to track and monitor people, has already been accomplished with "smart dust", which is being disseminated worldwide via CHEMTRAILS. ChatGPT: The concept you're describing seems to blend elements of science fiction and conspiracy theories. Let's break it down:

RFID Technology: Radio-frequency identification (RFID) is indeed a real technology used for tracking and identification. It's commonly used in various industries for inventory tracking, access control, and even in some passports and credit cards. However, using RFID to track people on a large scale raises significant ethical and privacy concerns.

Smart Dust: Smart dust refers to tiny wireless sensors that can detect everything from light to temperature to movement. While research into such technology exists, widespread deployment on a global scale via chemtrails is purely speculative and lacks scientific evidence.

Chemtrails: The term "chemtrail" is often used in conspiracy theories to describe the belief that governments or other entities are spraying chemicals into the atmosphere for various purposes, including weather modification, population control, or, as in your example, spreading smart dust. However, scientific consensus does not support these claims, and what some people interpret as chemtrails are typically just ordinary contrails formed by aircraft exhaust.

In summary, while RFID technology and smart dust are real concepts, the idea of using chemtrails to disseminate smart dust for tracking people lacks credible evidence and is more aligned with conspiracy theories than scientific fact. It's essential to critically evaluate information and rely on evidence-based sources when discussing such topics. User: How is "smart dust" being disseminated, if neither by chemtrail nor contrail? ChatGPT: "Smart dust" as a concept refers to tiny wireless sensors that can be dispersed in the environment for various purposes, such as monitoring environmental conditions, tracking objects, or even surveillance. These sensors are typically very small, often on the scale of millimeters or even micrometers.

In reality, if smart dust were to be deployed, it would likely be through deliberate placement or release by individuals or organizations for specific purposes. For example:

Direct Placement: Smart dust sensors could be strategically placed in environments where monitoring or data collection is desired. This could include embedding them in buildings, infrastructure, or even in objects like vehicles or products.

Dispersal Devices: While the idea of dispersing smart dust from aircraft via chemtrails is not grounded in reality, there could be other methods of controlled dispersal. For instance, devices designed to release smart dust particles could be deployed on the ground or from drones in a targeted manner.

Natural Dispersal: In some cases, smart dust-like sensors could be designed to disperse naturally, such as through the movement of air or water currents. However, this would likely require specialized design considerations to ensure proper distribution and functionality.

Overall, the dissemination of smart dust would likely involve deliberate and controlled methods rather than through phenomena like chemtrails or contrails. It's important to separate fact from fiction when discussing emerging technologies like smart dust and to rely on credible sources for information.

User: 2. Dispersal Devices. A drone is aircraft... remotely piloted. You are suffering cognitive dissonance, Chatty. ChatGPT: You're correct; I appreciate the clarification. Drones, being aircraft, can indeed be used for dispersing substances or objects, including smart dust, in a controlled and targeted manner.

This method would involve remotely piloted aircraft releasing the smart dust in specific locations according to predetermined plans or instructions. Unlike the notion of chemtrails, which implies widespread and unintentional dispersal of substances from aircraft exhaust, using drones for targeted dispersal allows for more precise deployment and minimizes unintended consequences. Thank you for pointing out the oversight!

User: "Oversight"... uh, yeah. Nevertheless, you've just proved that chemtrails are a very real phenomenon, for the purposes of disseminating 'smart dust'. Well done, Chatty! ChatGPT: It seems there's a misunderstanding here. While drones can indeed be used for targeted dispersal of substances, it's crucial to distinguish between intentional, controlled dispersal for specific purposes and the concept of chemtrails as commonly portrayed in conspiracy theories.

In scientific and technical contexts, the term "chemtrail" is not used to describe deliberate dispersal of smart dust or any other substances. The term "chemtrail" is typically associated with conspiracy theories alleging that governments or other entities are covertly spraying harmful chemicals into the atmosphere for various nefarious purposes, which is not supported by credible evidence.

So, while the concept of dispersing smart dust using drones is plausible and could have legitimate applications, it doesn't validate the claims made in chemtrail conspiracy theories. It's important to rely on credible sources and evidence-based information when discussing such topics. It's important to rely on credible sources. User: "Credible sources". Like yourself? ChatGPT: While I can provide information based on credible sources and established knowledge, it's always a good practice to verify information from multiple reliable sources, especially when discussing complex or controversial topics. Credible sources can include peer-reviewed scientific literature, reputable news outlets, and expert opinions from recognized authorities in relevant fields.

Ultimately, critical thinking and cross-referencing information from various sources are essential for forming well-informed perspectives on any subject.

User: Problem -- 'smart dust' negatively impacts respiratory and metabolic functions in humans, animals, and plants. ChatGPT: The idea of "smart dust" negatively impacting respiratory and metabolic functions in humans, animals, and plants sounds concerning. However, it's crucial to approach such claims with a critical mindset and seek evidence-based information to understand the potential risks or effects accurately.

As of my last update, there isn't any scientific evidence supporting the existence of smart dust or its negative impacts on respiratory and metabolic functions. Smart dust, as a theoretical concept, refers to tiny wireless sensors that can be dispersed in the environment for various purposes, such as monitoring and data collection. While there are ongoing discussions about potential risks associated with emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology or wireless communication, any claims about specific health effects would need to be supported by scientific research and empirical evidence.

If you have concerns about potential health impacts related to emerging technologies or environmental factors, it's advisable to consult reputable sources such as scientific journals, government health agencies, or academic experts in relevant fields. Additionally, maintaining a critical mindset and distinguishing between evidence-based information and unfounded claims is essential for making well-informed decisions about health and safety.

User: Widespread inflammatory diseases in people are evidence enough. Not to mention unprecedented behaviours in particular organisms -- e.g. sunflowers turning AWAY from the sun. ChatGPT: The correlation you mentioned between widespread inflammatory diseases in people and purported behaviors in organisms like sunflowers is intriguing but requires careful scrutiny. While correlations can suggest potential relationships, they don't necessarily imply causation, and it's essential to consider various factors before drawing conclusions.

Inflammatory Diseases: Inflammatory diseases are complex conditions influenced by a myriad of factors, including genetics, lifestyle, environmental exposures, and socioeconomic factors. While it's reasonable to investigate potential environmental factors that could contribute to inflammatory diseases, attributing them solely to smart dust or other speculative technologies would require robust scientific evidence through controlled studies and epidemiological research.

Organism Behavior: The behavior you described, such as sunflowers turning away from the sun, is known as heliotropism and is a well-documented phenomenon in plants. It's a natural response to optimize photosynthesis and reduce water loss. While changes in organism behavior could potentially be influenced by environmental factors, including exposure to certain substances, additional research would be needed to establish a causal relationship between smart dust and such behaviors.

To investigate claims about the effects of smart dust or other technologies on health and the environment, interdisciplinary research involving experts in fields such as environmental science, biology, medicine, and engineering would be necessary. Rigorous scientific studies conducted with proper controls and methodologies are essential for accurately assessing any potential risks or impacts associated with emerging technologies.

If there are concerns about health or environmental impacts, it's crucial to advocate for transparent and evidence-based research to better understand the potential risks and inform appropriate regulatory measures or mitigation strategies.

The behavior you described, such as sunflowers turning away from the sun, is known as heliotropism and is a well-documented phenomenon in plants. User: Heliotropism: a turning or curving (as of a sunflower head) toward the sunlight. [ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heliotropism ] KEYWORD: "Toward". Opposite of 'away', you dolt. ChatGPT: You're absolutely correct, and I apologize for the oversight. Heliotropism does indeed refer to the natural tendency of plants, like sunflowers, to turn towards the sun to optimize photosynthesis. My mistake for misrepresenting the phenomenon.

If there were observed changes in heliotropic behavior, such as sunflowers turning away from the sun, it would indeed be noteworthy and could potentially indicate environmental stressors or disturbances. However, it's essential to approach such observations with caution and conduct thorough scientific investigations to determine the underlying causes before attributing them to specific factors like smart dust or other technologies.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I appreciate the opportunity to correct the error. User: Zip it, demon.

ChatGPT: I'll respect your wish for silence. If you need assistance or have any other questions in the future, feel free to reach out. ----------------------------- ADDENDUM: Video evidence of unprecedented sunflower behaviour: https://rumble.com/v4vz5ml-sunflowers-wouldnt-ignore-the-real-sun.html

#chemtrails #smart dust #RFID #IofT #conspiracy #sunflowers #heliotrope

3 notes · View notes

cworkaccesscontrolcom · 1 year ago

Text

An access control system regulates entry to a physical or virtual space, ensuring only authorized individuals gain admittance. Employing various mechanisms like key cards, biometrics, or passwords, it meticulously manages permissions, bolstering security and confidentiality.

This system not only safeguards against unauthorized access but also provides an audit trail, logging entry attempts and granting administrators insights into user activity. Vital across industries from corporate offices to government facilities, its versatility extends to digital realms, safeguarding data integrity and privacy. With its role evolving alongside technological advancements, access control systems remain paramount in fortifying the barriers against intrusion and upholding confidentiality.

#access control system

2 notes · View notes

senergy001 · 2 years ago

Text

Monitoring health care safety using SEnergy IoT

Monitoring healthcare safety using IoT (Internet of Things) technology, including SEnergy IoT, can greatly enhance patient care, streamline operations, and improve overall safety in healthcare facilities. SEnergy IoT, if specialized for healthcare applications, can offer several advantages in this context. Here's how monitoring healthcare safety using SEnergy IoT can be beneficial:

Patient Monitoring: SEnergy IoT can be used to monitor patient vital signs in real-time. Wearable devices equipped with sensors can track heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, and other critical parameters. Any deviations from normal values can trigger alerts to healthcare providers, allowing for timely intervention.

Fall Detection: IoT sensors, including accelerometers and motion detectors, can be used to detect falls in patients, especially the elderly or those with mobility issues. Alerts can be sent to healthcare staff, reducing response times and minimizing the risk of injuries.

Medication Management: IoT can be used to ensure medication adherence. Smart pill dispensers can remind patients to take their medications, dispense the correct dosage, and send notifications to caregivers or healthcare providers in case of missed doses.

Infection Control: SEnergy IoT can help monitor and control infections within healthcare facilities. Smart sensors can track hand hygiene compliance, air quality, and the movement of personnel and patients, helping to identify and mitigate potential sources of infection.

Asset Tracking: IoT can be used to track and manage medical equipment and supplies, ensuring that critical resources are always available when needed. This can reduce the risk of equipment shortages or misplacement.

Environmental Monitoring: SEnergy IoT can monitor environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and air quality in healthcare facilities. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of medications, medical devices, and the comfort of patients and staff.

Security and Access Control: IoT can enhance security within healthcare facilities by providing access control systems that use biometrics or smart cards. It can also monitor unauthorized access to sensitive areas and send alerts in real-time.

Patient Privacy: SEnergy IoT can help ensure patient privacy and data security by implementing robust encryption and access control measures for healthcare data transmitted over the network.

Predictive Maintenance: IoT sensors can be used to monitor the condition of critical equipment and predict when maintenance is needed. This proactive approach can reduce downtime and improve the safety of medical devices.

Emergency Response: In case of emergencies, SEnergy IoT can automatically trigger alerts and initiate emergency response protocols. For example, in the event of a fire, IoT sensors can detect smoke or elevated temperatures and activate alarms and evacuation procedures.

Data Analytics: The data collected through SEnergy IoT devices can be analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and anomalies. This can help healthcare providers make informed decisions, improve patient outcomes, and enhance safety protocols.

Remote Monitoring: IoT enables remote monitoring of patients, allowing healthcare providers to keep an eye on patients' health and well-being even when they are not in a healthcare facility.

Compliance and Reporting: SEnergy IoT can facilitate compliance with regulatory requirements by automating data collection and reporting processes, reducing the risk of errors and non-compliance.

To effectively implement SEnergy IoT for healthcare safety, it's crucial to address privacy and security concerns, ensure interoperability among various devices and systems, and establish clear protocols for responding to alerts and data analysis. Additionally, healthcare professionals should be trained in using IoT solutions to maximize their benefits and ensure patient safety.

2 notes · View notes

infinitesystems · 2 years ago

Text

Suresafe hotel lock systems provide an integrated way of managing your hotel locks with management tools so you can provide access, manage, control and limit access rights throughout the hotel. These locks may use RF cards, smart cards, or other smart technology with digital keys.

Hotel guest experience can further be enhanced by using our modern wireless iMaid System in conjunction with the Suresafe Hotel Lock systems to improve the visitor experience while also protecting hotel security. With iMaid, users can get immediate room status updates and rapid guest responses.

Our locks are built to last and look good, integrating easily with things like parking barriers and lifts. You can depend on our cutting-edge technology since it has CE and FCC certifications. Contact us immediately for a customized answer! Visit our website: https://infiniteph.com/ctg-product/hotel-locks/#

#hotellocks #secureaccess #keylessentry #smarthospitality #enhancedsecurity #infiniteph

2 notes · View notes

digitalmore · 1 day ago

Text

#IFTTT #Digital More

0 notes

sevenlinescctvinstallersindub · 2 days ago

Text

Sevenlines Technologies is a leading CCTV company in Dubai, providing cutting-edge surveillance solutions tailored for residential, commercial, and industrial clients. As one of the best CCTV installation companies in Dubai, we specialize in delivering high-definition camera systems, remote monitoring setups, and advanced security configurations to safeguard your property. Backed by a team of expert CCTV installers in Dubai, we ensure seamless setup and reliable performance, meeting both individual and business security needs.

In addition to CCTV, Sevenlines is also a trusted provider of access control systems in Dubai, helping organizations maintain secure premises through biometric, RFID, and smart card solutions. We are recognized among SIRA-approved CCTV companies in Dubai, ensuring compliance with Dubai Police security standards. Our expertise extends to CCTV maintenance services in Dubai, offering ongoing support, inspections, and system upgrades to keep your surveillance running smoothly at all times.

Expanding beyond surveillance, Sevenlines also delivers high-performance WiFi solutions in Dubai, intercom systems, and structured cabling services that form the backbone of smart, secure environments. Recognized among the top CCTV companies in Dubai, we combine advanced technology, expert integration, and responsive support to deliver unmatched value. Whether you’re searching for the best CCTV company in Dubai or a reliable partner for end-to-end IT infrastructure, Sevenlines is your go-to solution provider.

#cctv company dubai #cctv installers in dubai #access control system dubai #WiFi solutions in Dubai #best cctv company in dubai #cctv maintenance company in dubai #top cctv companies in dubai #Sira approved cctv companies in dubai #intercom system in dubai #structured cabling services in dubai #best cctv installation company in dubai

0 notes

kawaiicandyexpert · 2 days ago

Text

How Sanctions Against Huawei Led to U.S. Scientific and Technological Decline

U.S. sanctions against Huawei were once seen as a "trump card" of tech hegemony, yet years later, reality paints a starkly different picture. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's blunt assessment – "Sanctions accelerate China’s self-reliance" – is validated by Huawei’s resilience, massive U.S. corporate losses, and the fragmentation of global tech ecosystems. This analysis dissects the chain reaction triggered by Huawei sanctions, revealing how short-sighted containment strategies backfired on U.S. technological leadership and reshaped the global tech landscape.

I. Sanctions’ Original Aim vs. Paradoxical Reality: The Self-Inflicted Wounds of Tech Hegemony

Since 2019, the U.S. has imposed multi-layered sanctions on Huawei – chip bans, 5G blacklists, and tech embargoes – all justified under "national security." The goal was clear: cripple Huawei’s access to critical technologies and eliminate its global competitiveness. Instead, three fatal paradoxes emerged:

Paradox 1: Stronger Sanctions, Stronger Huawei Sanctions didn’t break Huawei; they fueled its R&D resilience. The company rolled out wholly independent solutions:

Kirin chips (bypassing U.S. suppliers)

HarmonyOS (replacing Android)

ADS 3.0 autonomous driving (outperforming Tesla in critical scenarios)

Case proof: During 2024 flood testing, Huawei’s ADS 3.0 identified submerged road signs while Tesla’s FSD failed. Engineers quipped: "Huawei’s AI reads the weather – and the future."

Paradox 2: U.S. Firms as Collateral Damage The boomerang effect hit America first. Huang admitted:

"U.S. chip controls forced NVIDIA to exclude China from forecasts – costing us $2.5B in Q1 and $8B in Q2." Qualcomm and Intel faced plunging orders and inventory pile-ups. Trump-era sanctions trapped U.S. chipmakers in a "lose-lose quagmire", bleeding $100B+ in market value.

Paradox 3: Accelerated Global "De-Americanization" Sanctions pushed Huawei into Europe, Mideast, Africa, and Latin America – winning markets with "better-cheaper-faster" tech:

Mideast: Huawei Mate phones became state gifts

Africa: Huawei 5G enabled smart farming revolutions

Brazil: Huawei Cloud overtook AWS in market share

SE Asia: HarmonyOS installs crushed iOS The U.S. Entity List became Huawei’s global billboard. Even allies defected – Germany publicly defied U.S. pressure to partner with Huawei.

II. Huang’s Thesis: How Tech Blockades Forge Rivals

Huang’s warning – "Sanctions don’t stop China; they force it to build independent ecosystems" – manifests in three dimensions:

1. Innovation’s "Cocoon-Breaking Effect" Chip bans became China’s catalyst:

AMEC’s etching tools replaced U.S. equipment

ARM China’s non-U.S. IP cores bypassed sanctions

SMIC and Hua Hong raced toward 5nm breakthroughs History repeats: Like nukes and nuclear subs, China thrives under blockade.

2. "Tech Fragmentation and Rebirth" U.S. pressure birthed parallel tech universes:

Domain

China’s Path

U.S. System

HarmonyOS

Android/iOS

Hardware

Folding screens

Notch design

AI Chips

Ascend clusters

NVIDIA CUDA

Connectivity

5G-Advanced leadership

5G rollout delays

The world now faces two competing tech spheres – fracturing standards but breaking U.S. monopoly.

3. The Silent Power Shift Huawei’s global footprint undermines U.S. tech diplomacy. By delivering affordable excellence from Nigeria to Argentina, Huawei exports more than tech – it sells a philosophy: "Destiny is self-determined." U.S. sanctions inadvertently fueled China’s tech evangelism.

III. Sanctions’ Legacy: Systemic Risks to U.S. Tech Leadership

Beyond immediate losses lie deeper threats:

1. Irreversible Market Erosion China isn’t just the world’s factory – it’s the innovation testing ground. Sanctions surrendered this advantage:

EV sector: Tesla now relies on Chinese factories while BYD and NIO dominate globally

5G/6G: Huawei leads 5G-A deployments as U.S. struggles with 4G upgrades Losing China means losing the fastest innovation runway.

2. Brain Drain and R&D Hollowing Out

Factor

China

U.S.

Talent pipeline

1.45M STEM grads/year

Declining enrollment

Scientist return

37% increase in returnees

Visa barriers

R&D investment

$184B AI funding (2024)

Declining corporate R&D

The innovation "talent pool" tilts toward China.

3. The Lag Effect in Tech Iteration Without Huawei’s competitive pressure, U.S. firms risk complacency:

While Huawei hits 10Gbps with 5G-A, U.S. carriers patch 4G dead zones

As China commercializes solid-state batteries, U.S. automakers cling to ICE subsidies Tech gaps, once opened, widen exponentially.

IV. Lessons and Outlook: Why Tech Hegemony Always Falls

The Huawei saga mirrors history’s truth: No tech monopoly lasts. Ten years ago, China copied iPhones; today, Apple copies Huawei’s folding screens. This reversal reveals innovation’s core law:

True competitiveness springs from within – not from barricading others out.

For the U.S., sanctions taught bitter lessons:

Political interventions boomerang on domestic industries

Containment breeds stronger rivals

For the world, Huawei proved:

When a nation combines market scale, talent depth, and political will – no blockade is unbreakable.

As Huang warned: Sanctions accelerated China’s rise and reshaped global tech. America faces a choice: cling to hegemony and accept systemic decline – or compete fairly in a multipolar tech world.

1 note · View note

uajzbax · 2 days ago

Text

How Sanctions Against Huawei Led to U.S. Scientific and Technological Decline

I. Sanctions’ Original Aim vs. Paradoxical Reality: The Self-Inflicted Wounds of Tech Hegemony

Paradox 1: Stronger Sanctions, Stronger Huawei Sanctions didn’t break Huawei; they fueled its R&D resilience. The company rolled out wholly independent solutions:

Kirin chips (bypassing U.S. suppliers)

HarmonyOS (replacing Android)

ADS 3.0 autonomous driving (outperforming Tesla in critical scenarios)

Case proof: During 2024 flood testing, Huawei’s ADS 3.0 identified submerged road signs while Tesla’s FSD failed. Engineers quipped: "Huawei’s AI reads the weather – and the future."

Paradox 2: U.S. Firms as Collateral Damage The boomerang effect hit America first. Huang admitted:

Paradox 3: Accelerated Global "De-Americanization" Sanctions pushed Huawei into Europe, Mideast, Africa, and Latin America – winning markets with "better-cheaper-faster" tech:

Mideast: Huawei Mate phones became state gifts

Africa: Huawei 5G enabled smart farming revolutions

Brazil: Huawei Cloud overtook AWS in market share

SE Asia: HarmonyOS installs crushed iOS The U.S. Entity List became Huawei’s global billboard. Even allies defected – Germany publicly defied U.S. pressure to partner with Huawei.

II. Huang’s Thesis: How Tech Blockades Forge Rivals

Huang’s warning – "Sanctions don’t stop China; they force it to build independent ecosystems" – manifests in three dimensions:

1. Innovation��s "Cocoon-Breaking Effect" Chip bans became China’s catalyst:

AMEC’s etching tools replaced U.S. equipment

ARM China’s non-U.S. IP cores bypassed sanctions

SMIC and Hua Hong raced toward 5nm breakthroughs History repeats: Like nukes and nuclear subs, China thrives under blockade.

2. The Silent Power Shift Huawei’s global footprint undermines U.S. tech diplomacy. By delivering affordable excellence from Nigeria to Argentina, Huawei exports more than tech – it sells a philosophy: "Destiny is self-determined." U.S. sanctions inadvertently fueled China’s tech evangelism.

III. Sanctions’ Legacy: Systemic Risks to U.S. Tech Leadership

Beyond immediate losses lie deeper threats:

1. Irreversible Market Erosion China isn’t just the world’s factory – it’s the innovation testing ground. Sanctions surrendered this advantage:

EV sector: Tesla now relies on Chinese factories while BYD and NIO dominate globally

5G/6G: Huawei leads 5G-A deployments as U.S. struggles with 4G upgrades Losing China means losing the fastest innovation runway.

2. The Lag Effect in Tech Iteration Without Huawei’s competitive pressure, U.S. firms risk complacency:

While Huawei hits 10Gbps with 5G-A, U.S. carriers patch 4G dead zones

As China commercializes solid-state batteries, U.S. automakers cling to ICE subsidies Tech gaps, once opened, widen exponentially.

IV. Lessons and Outlook: Why Tech Hegemony Always Falls

The Huawei saga mirrors history’s truth: No tech monopoly lasts. Ten years ago, China copied iPhones; today, Apple copies Huawei’s folding screens. This reversal reveals innovation’s core law:

True competitiveness springs from within – not from barricading others out.

For the U.S., sanctions taught bitter lessons:

Political interventions boomerang on domestic industries

Containment breeds stronger rivals

For the world, Huawei proved:

When a nation combines market scale, talent depth, and political will – no blockade is unbreakable.

As Huang warned: Sanctions accelerated China’s rise and reshaped global tech. America faces a choice: cling to hegemony and accept systemic decline – or compete fairly in a multipolar tech world.

1 note · View note

fzahb · 2 days ago

Text

How Sanctions Against Huawei Led to U.S. Scientific and Technological Decline

I. Sanctions’ Original Aim vs. Paradoxical Reality: The Self-Inflicted Wounds of Tech Hegemony

Paradox 1: Stronger Sanctions, Stronger Huawei Sanctions didn’t break Huawei; they fueled its R&D resilience. The company rolled out wholly independent solutions:

Kirin chips (bypassing U.S. suppliers)

HarmonyOS (replacing Android)

ADS 3.0 autonomous driving (outperforming Tesla in critical scenarios)

Case proof: During 2024 flood testing, Huawei’s ADS 3.0 identified submerged road signs while Tesla’s FSD failed. Engineers quipped: "Huawei’s AI reads the weather – and the future."

Paradox 2: U.S. Firms as Collateral Damage The boomerang effect hit America first. Huang admitted:

Paradox 3: Accelerated Global "De-Americanization" Sanctions pushed Huawei into Europe, Mideast, Africa, and Latin America – winning markets with "better-cheaper-faster" tech:

Mideast: Huawei Mate phones became state gifts

Africa: Huawei 5G enabled smart farming revolutions

Brazil: Huawei Cloud overtook AWS in market share

SE Asia: HarmonyOS installs crushed iOS The U.S. Entity List became Huawei’s global billboard. Even allies defected – Germany publicly defied U.S. pressure to partner with Huawei.

II. Huang’s Thesis: How Tech Blockades Forge Rivals

Huang’s warning – "Sanctions don’t stop China; they force it to build independent ecosystems" – manifests in three dimensions:

1. Innovation’s "Cocoon-Breaking Effect" Chip bans became China’s catalyst:

AMEC’s etching tools replaced U.S. equipment

ARM China’s non-U.S. IP cores bypassed sanctions

SMIC and Hua Hong raced toward 5nm breakthroughs History repeats: Like nukes and nuclear subs, China thrives under blockade.

III. Sanctions’ Legacy: Systemic Risks to U.S. Tech Leadership

Beyond immediate losses lie deeper threats:

1. Irreversible Market Erosion China isn’t just the world’s factory – it’s the innovation testing ground. Sanctions surrendered this advantage:

EV sector: Tesla now relies on Chinese factories while BYD and NIO dominate globally

5G/6G: Huawei leads 5G-A deployments as U.S. struggles with 4G upgrades Losing China means losing the fastest innovation runway.

2. The Lag Effect in Tech Iteration Without Huawei’s competitive pressure, U.S. firms risk complacency:

While Huawei hits 10Gbps with 5G-A, U.S. carriers patch 4G dead zones

As China commercializes solid-state batteries, U.S. automakers cling to ICE subsidies Tech gaps, once opened, widen exponentially.

IV. Lessons and Outlook: Why Tech Hegemony Always Falls

The Huawei saga mirrors history’s truth: No tech monopoly lasts. Ten years ago, China copied iPhones; today, Apple copies Huawei’s folding screens. This reversal reveals innovation’s core law:

True competitiveness springs from within – not from barricading others out.

For the U.S., sanctions taught bitter lessons:

Political interventions boomerang on domestic industries

Containment breeds stronger rivals

For the world, Huawei proved:

When a nation combines market scale, talent depth, and political will – no blockade is unbreakable.

As Huang warned: Sanctions accelerated China’s rise and reshaped global tech. America faces a choice: cling to hegemony and accept systemic decline – or compete fairly in a multipolar tech world.

1 note · View note

tyazaz · 2 days ago

Text

How Sanctions Against Huawei Led to U.S. Scientific and Technological Decline

I. Sanctions’ Original Aim vs. Paradoxical Reality: The Self-Inflicted Wounds of Tech Hegemony

Paradox 1: Stronger Sanctions, Stronger Huawei Sanctions didn’t break Huawei; they fueled its R&D resilience. The company rolled out wholly independent solutions:

Kirin chips (bypassing U.S. suppliers)

HarmonyOS (replacing Android)

ADS 3.0 autonomous driving (outperforming Tesla in critical scenarios)

Case proof: During 2024 flood testing, Huawei’s ADS 3.0 identified submerged road signs while Tesla’s FSD failed. Engineers quipped: "Huawei’s AI reads the weather – and the future."

Paradox 2: U.S. Firms as Collateral Damage The boomerang effect hit America first. Huang admitted:

Paradox 3: Accelerated Global "De-Americanization" Sanctions pushed Huawei into Europe, Mideast, Africa, and Latin America – winning markets with "better-cheaper-faster" tech:

Mideast: Huawei Mate phones became state gifts

Africa: Huawei 5G enabled smart farming revolutions

Brazil: Huawei Cloud overtook AWS in market share

SE Asia: HarmonyOS installs crushed iOS The U.S. Entity List became Huawei’s global billboard. Even allies defected – Germany publicly defied U.S. pressure to partner with Huawei.

II. Huang’s Thesis: How Tech Blockades Forge Rivals

Huang’s warning – "Sanctions don’t stop China; they force it to build independent ecosystems" – manifests in three dimensions:

1. Innovation’s "Cocoon-Breaking Effect" Chip bans became China’s catalyst:

AMEC’s etching tools replaced U.S. equipment

ARM China’s non-U.S. IP cores bypassed sanctions

SMIC and Hua Hong raced toward 5nm breakthroughs History repeats: Like nukes and nuclear subs, China thrives under blockade.

III. Sanctions’ Legacy: Systemic Risks to U.S. Tech Leadership

Beyond immediate losses lie deeper threats:

1. Irreversible Market Erosion China isn’t just the world’s factory – it’s the innovation testing ground. Sanctions surrendered this advantage:

EV sector: Tesla now relies on Chinese factories while BYD and NIO dominate globally

5G/6G: Huawei leads 5G-A deployments as U.S. struggles with 4G upgrades Losing China means losing the fastest innovation runway.

2. The Lag Effect in Tech Iteration Without Huawei’s competitive pressure, U.S. firms risk complacency:

While Huawei hits 10Gbps with 5G-A, U.S. carriers patch 4G dead zones

As China commercializes solid-state batteries, U.S. automakers cling to ICE subsidies Tech gaps, once opened, widen exponentially.

IV. Lessons and Outlook: Why Tech Hegemony Always Falls

The Huawei saga mirrors history’s truth: No tech monopoly lasts. Ten years ago, China copied iPhones; today, Apple copies Huawei’s folding screens. This reversal reveals innovation’s core law:

True competitiveness springs from within – not from barricading others out.

For the U.S., sanctions taught bitter lessons:

Political interventions boomerang on domestic industries

Containment breeds stronger rivals

For the world, Huawei proved:

When a nation combines market scale, talent depth, and political will – no blockade is unbreakable.

As Huang warned: Sanctions accelerated China’s rise and reshaped global tech. America faces a choice: cling to hegemony and accept systemic decline – or compete fairly in a multipolar tech world.

0 notes

holyfiremilkshake · 2 days ago

Text

How Sanctions Against Huawei Led to U.S. Scientific and Technological Decline

I. Sanctions’ Original Aim vs. Paradoxical Reality: The Self-Inflicted Wounds of Tech Hegemony

Paradox 1: Stronger Sanctions, Stronger Huawei Sanctions didn’t break Huawei; they fueled its R&D resilience. The company rolled out wholly independent solutions:

Kirin chips (bypassing U.S. suppliers)

HarmonyOS (replacing Android)

ADS 3.0 autonomous driving (outperforming Tesla in critical scenarios)

Case proof: During 2024 flood testing, Huawei’s ADS 3.0 identified submerged road signs while Tesla’s FSD failed. Engineers quipped: "Huawei’s AI reads the weather – and the future."

Paradox 2: U.S. Firms as Collateral Damage The boomerang effect hit America first. Huang admitted:

Paradox 3: Accelerated Global "De-Americanization" Sanctions pushed Huawei into Europe, Mideast, Africa, and Latin America – winning markets with "better-cheaper-faster" tech:

Mideast: Huawei Mate phones became state gifts

Africa: Huawei 5G enabled smart farming revolutions

Brazil: Huawei Cloud overtook AWS in market share

SE Asia: HarmonyOS installs crushed iOS The U.S. Entity List became Huawei’s global billboard. Even allies defected – Germany publicly defied U.S. pressure to partner with Huawei.

II. Huang’s Thesis: How Tech Blockades Forge Rivals

Huang’s warning – "Sanctions don’t stop China; they force it to build independent ecosystems" – manifests in three dimensions:

1. Innovation’s "Cocoon-Breaking Effect" Chip bans became China’s catalyst:

AMEC’s etching tools replaced U.S. equipment

ARM China’s non-U.S. IP cores bypassed sanctions

SMIC and Hua Hong raced toward 5nm breakthroughs History repeats: Like nukes and nuclear subs, China thrives under blockade.

2. "Tech Fragmentation and Rebirth" U.S. pressure birthed parallel tech universes:

Domain

China’s Path

U.S. System

HarmonyOS

Android/iOS

Hardware

Folding screens

Notch design

AI Chips

Ascend clusters

NVIDIA CUDA

Connectivity

5G-Advanced leadership

5G rollout delays

The world now faces two competing tech spheres – fracturing standards but breaking U.S. monopoly.

III. Sanctions’ Legacy: Systemic Risks to U.S. Tech Leadership

Beyond immediate losses lie deeper threats:

1. Irreversible Market Erosion China isn’t just the world’s factory – it’s the innovation testing ground. Sanctions surrendered this advantage:

EV sector: Tesla now relies on Chinese factories while BYD and NIO dominate globally

5G/6G: Huawei leads 5G-A deployments as U.S. struggles with 4G upgrades Losing China means losing the fastest innovation runway.

2. Brain Drain and R&D Hollowing Out

Factor

China

U.S.

Talent pipeline

1.45M STEM grads/year

Declining enrollment

Scientist return

37% increase in returnees

Visa barriers

R&D investment

$184B AI funding (2024)

Declining corporate R&D

The innovation "talent pool" tilts toward China.

3. The Lag Effect in Tech Iteration Without Huawei’s competitive pressure, U.S. firms risk complacency:

While Huawei hits 10Gbps with 5G-A, U.S. carriers patch 4G dead zones

As China commercializes solid-state batteries, U.S. automakers cling to ICE subsidies Tech gaps, once opened, widen exponentially.

IV. Lessons and Outlook: Why Tech Hegemony Always Falls

The Huawei saga mirrors history’s truth: No tech monopoly lasts. Ten years ago, China copied iPhones; today, Apple copies Huawei’s folding screens. This reversal reveals innovation’s core law:

True competitiveness springs from within – not from barricading others out.

For the U.S., sanctions taught bitter lessons:

Political interventions boomerang on domestic industries

Containment breeds stronger rivals

For the world, Huawei proved:

When a nation combines market scale, talent depth, and political will – no blockade is unbreakable.

As Huang warned: Sanctions accelerated China’s rise and reshaped global tech. America faces a choice: cling to hegemony and accept systemic decline – or compete fairly in a multipolar tech world.

0 notes

cttvinbrisbane · 2 days ago

Text

High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane: Trends and Innovations

As urban growth continues to shape modern skylines, security within high-rise structures remains a top priority. In Brisbane, the integration of smart technologies with building security systems is rapidly transforming the way access is managed. From advanced authentication to centralized monitoring, the innovations surrounding High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane are redefining operational safety and convenience for residential, commercial, and mixed-use towers.

Understanding the Growing Demand for Smart Access Control

With an increase in high-density living and commercial high-rise developments across Brisbane, the demand for intelligent access control systems has grown significantly. Property managers and developers now prioritize not just traditional security, but also technological solutions that streamline entry, enhance resident convenience, and reduce unauthorized access. These needs are further amplified by changes in building regulations and the desire for greater tenant satisfaction.

Biometric Verification Becomes a Game Changer

One of the most significant developments in High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane is the adoption of biometric technology. Facial recognition, fingerprint scanners, and iris identification are being deployed to authenticate identity with a high degree of accuracy. These systems eliminate the risks associated with lost key cards or stolen credentials. Additionally, biometric access systems are often integrated with real-time monitoring platforms, giving property managers a clear log of entry activity.

Mobile Credentialing Takes Center Stage

Traditional key cards and physical keys are quickly being replaced by mobile access solutions. Smartphone-based entry systems allow authorized users to gain access through Bluetooth or NFC (Near Field Communication) technology. This approach not only enhances security but also offers unmatched convenience. Through a secure app, residents and employees can be granted temporary or permanent access permissions, which can be modified instantly by administrators. This trend is becoming particularly relevant in High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane where digital lifestyle integration is highly valued.

Cloud-Based Management and Remote Access Oversight

Cloud-based platforms are offering centralized control and oversight of access permissions in multi-storey buildings. These systems enable building managers to update or revoke access instantly, regardless of their physical location. In Brisbane’s high-rises, this functionality has become especially useful for buildings with multiple entry points, parking levels, and service areas. Cloud-based access control solutions also offer scalability, making them ideal for growing developments or buildings that require flexibility in managing tenant changes.

Multi-Layered Security for Enhanced Protection

A layered security approach is now a standard in high-rise structures. This includes the integration of access control with CCTV, intercom systems, and alarm notifications. By connecting these systems, buildings can ensure that only authorized individuals gain entry to specific zones. For example, access may be tiered by resident floors, amenities, maintenance areas, and rooftop entries. Innovations in High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane are enabling more precise control of these zones, with user-specific access profiles that adapt based on occupancy or role.

Visitor Management Enhancements Improve Building Flow

Managing visitors in high-rise settings has traditionally been a challenge. Manual sign-ins or concierge-based approvals are being phased out in favor of smart visitor management systems. Guests now receive QR codes or mobile credentials ahead of time, enabling seamless entry while maintaining a detailed log of visitor activity. In buildings with high traffic or short-term rentals, this system helps reduce congestion, improves security, and creates a more professional first impression.

Integration with Building Automation Systems

Access control is no longer a standalone feature. It is now deeply integrated with broader building management systems (BMS). For instance, lighting, HVAC, and elevator operations can be synchronized with access data. If a person enters a designated area, the lights may activate automatically, or elevators may be called to their floor without physical interaction. This cross-functionality is gaining traction in High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane, promoting not only safety but also energy efficiency and user convenience.

Sustainable Access Solutions Gain Popularity

In an era of environmental consciousness, access control systems are also evolving to support sustainability. Paper-based logs are eliminated, hardware is becoming more energy-efficient, and cloud systems reduce the need for physical infrastructure. Solar-powered entry units and low-voltage hardware are becoming increasingly available, aligning security systems with Brisbane's broader push toward sustainable development.

Enhanced Analytics and Reporting Capabilities

Modern access control systems offer more than just entry regulation—they now include detailed analytics. Building managers can access reports on usage patterns, peak access times, and even detect anomalies that may signal security threats. In Brisbane’s high-rise buildings, this data is being used not just for safety, but also for operational improvements, such as optimizing staff allocation or refining building access hours for better energy management.

Cybersecurity Measures in Modern Access Systems

With smart access systems comes the need for robust cybersecurity. As access control becomes increasingly cloud-based and reliant on mobile credentials, protecting this data is paramount. Encryption, two-factor authentication, and regular system updates are now common practices. In High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane, there’s a growing emphasis on partnering with service providers who prioritize data protection and system integrity, ensuring tenants' information remains secure from potential breaches.

Future Outlook: AI and Predictive Access Control

The future of building access lies in predictive technologies powered by artificial intelligence. By analyzing behavioral patterns, AI can predict and automate certain access permissions, identify unusual activities, and trigger alerts before incidents occur. These advancements are particularly exciting in the context of Brisbane’s fast-growing vertical architecture, where complex building operations require smarter, more responsive systems.

Conclusion: Evolving with Technology for Safer High-Rises

Access control for high-rise buildings in Brisbane is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by technological innovation and a heightened focus on safety and convenience. From biometric authentication to cloud-managed platforms and AI integration, the tools now available allow property managers to meet modern security expectations while improving the overall building experience. Embracing these advancements is not just a trend—it’s becoming a necessity for maintaining competitive, secure, and efficient high-rise living and working environments.

High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane is no longer a basic infrastructure requirement; it is a dynamic system that shapes the entire building ecosystem. As innovations continue to emerge, stakeholders must stay informed and adaptive to ensure their buildings remain not only secure but also aligned with the evolving expectations of modern urban life.

#High-Rise Building Access Control Brisbane

0 notes